mherger wrote: 
> 
> Some want the checks more losely, some more strictly :-). It always 
> depends on the way it fails for the user... If it was stricter, we'd 
> fail more often than we fail with false positives, I believe.
> 

You're right. :)  Keep it as it is.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
reinholdk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36070
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99537

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
plugins@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to