mherger wrote: > > Some want the checks more losely, some more strictly :-). It always > depends on the way it fails for the user... If it was stricter, we'd > fail more often than we fail with false positives, I believe. >
You're right. :) Keep it as it is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ reinholdk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36070 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99537 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins