Moonbase;397282 Wrote: > An afterthought: I feel the code should be optimized for speed a little > it scans for about 2 hours now on my ~25k file collection > > Maybe regenerating the hashes on each and every track scanned is a > little overkill, dont you think? Id assume no one will change the > parameters while a scan is in progress > It's probably reading the tag values from the file and writing the result to the database that takes time, I suspect it doesn't matter if you regenerate the hashes every time.
Does your version perform slower than the original version ? -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info) 'My download page' (http://erland.isaksson.info/download) (Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse, Custom Scan, Custom Skip, Multi Library, Title Switcher and Database Query plugins' (http://wiki.erland.isaksson.info/index.php/Category:SlimServer)) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49483
_______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
