aubuti;398707 Wrote: > That sounds good to me. I definitely like the > don't-pull-it-if-it-wasn't-pushed approach. > > For the future... how about player-specific settings for whether a > player gets pushed to SN on suspend or just disconnects from the > suspended SC without pushing to SN? A month ago I would not have > imagined the demand for such a feature, but right now I have that > demand in my own family. My wife mostly uses a Duet and hates futzing > around with changing the music source between SC and SN, or doing WOL > via the SBC. So a simple suspend without pushing to SN works for her. > My son has an SB2 (IR remote only) in his room and really prefers > suspend-to-SN because the SB2 is his clock. But if the server is up, > he'd like it connected. > > Jeez, we're a lazy bunch. Maybe the plugin should butter our toast, > too. The easiest way to implement this without having to work up an elaborate player selection UI is just to provide an edit box on the prefs where you'd put a "white list" of player macs...if there are macs in the list, then only players in the list are "allowed" to be pushed to SN. Sort of the compliment to the existing "Specific players to restore" pull-back feature.
Is that the correct sort of UI symmetry to use here? As opposed to a "black list" of players to never push? Re buttering toast: my triglyceride levels aren't in such good shape...so I don't think I should help you there. -- gharris999 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48521 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
