epoch1970 wrote: > WOL on error seems to me the idea. I've been doing this from an appletv > (the hackable, os X based v1) to WOL on NFS access errors. Years on, > nobody complains. > It's an external process monitoring rise in the NFS error rate every > minute, so it is kind of slow to react. If squeezelite sends the wol > command then this should work faster. However the computer may take some > time to get up and running (esp. if it decides it's time to check > disksÂ…) > So hammering the server with a wol packet at the beginning of every song > (or every 5 minutes) regardless of server state might be a better > option. I think wol represents a very small network load, but I don't > have the figures in mind. Yes, a minuscule load. Much less than 1k per WOL attempt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48521
_______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
