callesoroe wrote: > This is rubbish..... There is a huge difference between Wimp 320 kbs and > Wimp-hifi(flac) . > Are you basing this claim on double-blind tests? If not, your statement is audiophool folklore. Blind testing is required to rule out that perceived differences are due to the placebo effect.
Your claim of an audible difference at 320 kbps contradicts what I've seen in scientific listening tests. (As a starting point, 'here ' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec_listening_test)are references to a bunch of listening tests. Alternatively, check out the "Listening Tests" subforums on hydrogenaudio.org.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dafiend's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=60637 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102351 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
