wt0 wrote: > No, the post you quoted is referring to the version on the Amazon App > store. Amazon devices do not have Google Play services installed, which > is required for Wear and Chromecast support, and Amazon tend to reject > apps that even hint at using anything Google related. > > The version on Google Play is exactly the same as the one that got > removed. > > The original app was most likely removed because the screenshots had > album covers in it and the legal arm of some record company probably > noticed and complained to Google. > > This of course is just a guess. Google never specifically said that the > screenshots were infringing, only that the app involved displaying album > covers. And they didn't mention this until after the removal and there > was nothing I could do about. > > I think Google's stance is that since they not review apps before > publication (at least not until very recently) and you could just > republish any app that was removed, they are not going to spend any > effort to try to work out the situation with you.
Ok apologies. To be clear I've purchased from the start and I have to pay again for the same app, if I want to continue to receive bug fixes etc? I am all for supporting you, but paying again for the same app, goes against the grain :( Now a material design makeover would be worth paying for :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ local.bin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22053 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96757 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
