Jeeze.... and I thought you guys were just too busy to be bothered with
PLUM. I have built a couple of production sites based on the plum
generated framework (one with a store) I had alot of questions as I was
building the sites and looked pretty deep into the custom tags. In some
cases I have to admit my understanding of the code was less than
complete and I had to "roll my own" because I did not want to bother you
guys.
Also I ended up implementing some slight mods to some of the tags to
meet some requirements I had (on the development side only...not in any
production sites)
Still can't do a thing with my oracle db though.
Thanks,
Frederick
saeed richardson wrote:
Thanks for the message.
I'm really looking forward to being involved this time around. Hope all is
going well in ATL.
_saeed
On 7/8/04 9:06 AM, "Adam Churvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not only are we still developing, but we're coming up on the next Private
Beta release in about two weeks.
The majority of active testers felt more comfortable sending us feedback
directly rather than posting to the list, so we were getting great feedback
but no one else on the list could see, learn from, and participate in
discussion on the items. So the list looked like deadville and interest
understandably dropped off.
We've continued working privately with the testers who have been really
dedicated to delving deeply into Plum and giving us quick turnaround on
issues and features, and the result is the release you will all get notice
about on this list in two weeks.
We've been working on usability and stability issues, lots of feature
changes and requests, creating tutorials, moving the various help and
documentation pieces into a single compiled help file like other commercial
software, etc. But the major issue has been the database synchronization
feature, which needed to be redesigned from the ground up, and which in turn
dictated a major architectural change to the rest of the application.
We've also made decisions on moving some features to V1.1 and later.
Enhancements to the Unit Test Generator that enable not only components but
also forms and action pages to be tested will move to V1.1, as will the
ability to generate components for not only stored procedures but for a
combination of stored procedures and CFQUERY calls directly to tables.
Methodology Manager will move to a post-V1.1 release.
I hope you will all engage this upcoming release and give us strong
feedback. From this upcoming release onward, we'd like everyone to send all
feedback to this discussion list rather than privately for the reasons I
mentioned above. Everyone will benefit more, and this list will achieve the
critical mass it needs.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia
Advanced Intensive ColdFusion MX Training:
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000
http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com
Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com
The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philipp Cielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: [plum] silence
Adam,
haven't seen any posts on this list for ages - are you still developing or
did I just miss the release date? ;-)
Philipp
--
cielen.com
Fressgass / Alte Oper
Grosse Bockenheimer Str. 54
60313 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
tel +49-69-29724620
fax +49-69-29724637
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:plum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Churvis
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [plum] Found small issue with generated code for verity cfc
Thanks for spotting that one, Freddy. We'll take care of it.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia
Advanced Intensive ColdFusion MX Training:
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000
http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com
Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com
The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now!
----- Original Message -----
From: "frederick valone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 9:31 AM
Subject: [plum] Found small issue with generated code for verity cfc
Adam and David,
How is everything going? I have not seen much PLUM activity so I would
bet you are pretty busy with other things right now. I just wanted to
let you know that there is a small error in the verity.cfc code
generated when you create a new collection.
The switch statement is generated using the current value of
#Application.dbPlatform# instead of "#Application.dbPlatform#" as
shown
below.
<cfswitch expression="Oracle9i">
<cfcase value="SQLServer">
ContentItemID + ',' + cast(Page as varchar(10)) AS
KeyValue,
</cfcase>
<cfcase value="Access">
ContentItemID & ',' & Page AS KeyValue,
</cfcase>
<cfcase value="Oracle9i">
ContentItemID || ',' || Page AS KeyValue,
</cfcase>
<cfdefaultcase>
ContentItemID + ',' + cast(Page as varchar(10)) AS
KeyValue,
</cfdefaultcase>
</cfswitch>
Hope to hear more from you guys soon.
Thanks,
Frederick
--
saeed t. richardson, computer project manager
duke university school of medicine, office of admissions
post office box 3710 durham, north carolina 27710
tel: 919.684.2985 toll: 877.684.2985 fax: 919.668.3714
"c code. c code run. run code run ... please!"
