>From what I've seen, there are some significant speed issues with Application.cfc. I was excited about the new framework, too, but the way it is structured seems to be more complicated for deploying across environments than editing a single envirnoment file.
I'd like to get your ideas on how an Application.cfc-based framework might be organized for Plum. How do you see the structure working? Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Member of Team Macromedia http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com Download Plum and other cool development tools, and get advanced intensive Master-level training: * C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers * ColdFusion MX Master Class * Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Fleitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:42 AM Subject: [plum] Thoughts on Application.cfc > Adam and David, > > Have you all given any thought to using Application.cfc versus Application.cfm in the future? I know a lot of folks > are/will be using 6.1 for quite a while, but it would be nice to adopt the feature set of CFMX7 going forward as well. > > Your thoughts/plans? > > v/r, > > Jeff > > ********************************************************************** > You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change > your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: > > http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm > ********************************************************************** > ********************************************************************** You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm **********************************************************************
