I was just curious as to whether you had looked into this, and apparently you
have.
Now that you mention it, I seem to remember something about speed being discussed on CF-Talk or CFCDEV a while back.
That is a valid concern. Can you share any comparison data between the two approaches?
I was looking at the potential flexibility of using the Application.cfc methods, and just trying to keep my apps current
with the latest technology and/or best practices.
Initially I thought of consolidating the Environment.cfm and Global.cfm templates into it. But you are right about the
Environment template. It is really nice to be able to have to really deal with only that one template when deploying a
project.
Nevermind <g>
Seriously, I may just play with it to see how I like it, and if I decide to adopt it's use I will post my
findings/pitfalls. Might be good for a KB article, because this issue will likely come up again as more people adopt Plum.
Thanks.
Jeff
Adam Churvis wrote:
From what I've seen, there are some significant speed issues with
Application.cfc. I was excited about the new framework, too, but the way it
is structured seems to be more complicated for deploying across environments
than editing a single envirnoment file.
I'd like to get your ideas on how an Application.cfc-based framework might
be organized for Plum. How do you see the structure working?
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com
Download Plum and other cool development tools,
and get advanced intensive Master-level training:
* C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Fleitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:42 AM
Subject: [plum] Thoughts on Application.cfc
Adam and David,
Have you all given any thought to using Application.cfc versus
Application.cfm in the future? I know a lot of folks
are/will be using 6.1 for quite a while, but it would be nice to adopt the
feature set of CFMX7 going forward as well.
Your thoughts/plans?
v/r,
Jeff
**********************************************************************
You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change
your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here:
http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change
your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here:
http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change
your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here:
http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm
**********************************************************************
