"David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/22/2005 09:03:23 PM:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Our portal is a lightweight implementation. I see it as more of a
> > portlet development environment rather than a production deployment
> > environment. I think meeting your requirements is more in scope for J2
> > at this time.
>
> Craig, out of curiosity, which requirements do you feel are to far out
> of scope for 1.1?
>
> David
Hi David,
I was talking from a 1.0.1 perspective, since active development on that version appears to be fading.
I don't know what the Pluto 1.1 requirements are outside of those delineated in the JSR-168 specification, and I do not have any expectations. I only feel that we should concentrate our efforts since we only have a small group of active developers at this time.
Perhaps we need to spell out our requirements on a page in the wiki?
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console David H. DeWolf
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console Jeremy Boynes
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console Craig Doremus
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console Jeremy Boynes
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console CDoremus
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Conso... David H. DeWolf
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo C... CDoremus
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Conso... Stefan Hepper
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console David H. DeWolf
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console Santiago Gala
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Conso... Raphaƫl Luta
- Re: Portal Server and Geronimo Console Santiago Gala
