On 11/29/05, Nick Lothian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/30/05, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Nick! Good to hear from you. . . > > > > Mmm.. I'm still around, just not doing much portlet stuff at the moment. > > > Craig IM'd me today and said he had noticed it. . .besides that > > nothing. Do we need to start a thread on what our community should be > > included. . .in addition to what is stated? > > > > Yeah. > > Have you considered asking for membership?
Yes, actually I applied eariler today as an individual. The other option is to apply as an "organization", but I wasn't too sure how representing Pluto would work. . .. I'd like to be involved and represent our community either way. We'll see what happens. > > > My hope is that we can get 1.1 out the door soon enough so that we can > > release a 2.0 around the time the spec becomes final. > > > > David > > > > It would be good to know who is going to develop 2.0. Presumably the > spec members aren't expecting it just to happen by magic. At the same > time hopefully no one is expecting to do a sudden code dump and say > "here you go - this is Pluto v2". Well, Stefan is the Lead of the Spec and a Committer. I'd assume that he'll be toughing base with us at some point to give us some insight, but you're right, having an active commiter involved would be a big plus. David > > Nick >
