Hi Craig,
sorry, I was on vacation the last 5 weeks, getting my new house finished
and am now trying to catch up with my mail...
My goal is to have the JSR 286 RI developed by the pluto community, and
yes, everyone can send comments, you don't need to be on the EG for
that. I'll also try to get out early public drafts as soon as possible
to give everyone the chance to comment and implement prototypes.
Ulrich will also help to get the RI development done inside the pluto
community.
I would like to have the EG not too big in order to be effective,
therefore I would suggest that the pluto community elects one member who
will represent the pluto community in the JSR 286. What does everyone
think of this?
The WSRP spec should be out for public review in Jan.
Stefan
Craig Doremus wrote:
Stefan (Hepper), can you comment on the involvement of Pluto Commiters
in the development of the Portlet 2.0 (JSR-286) RI?
I imagine all the Pluto committers cannot be on the Expert Group, but
I'm sure that some of us (including me) want to be involved with
developing the new RI.
Will we be able to contribute to the JSR-286 RI if we are not on the
Expert Group?
We will also need to get access to the developing WSRP 2.0 spec since
the new Portlet spec will align closely with the new WSRP spec (very
good idea, IMHO!). But WSRP 2.0 seems to be still under wraps. Will we
be able to take a peak at WSRP 2.0 soon or get a pre-release preview?
TIA
/Craig
Nick Lothian wrote:
(via http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37818)
Are any active committers on Pluto aware of JSR-286?
I hadn't heard anything about it.
One interesting point:
2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as
part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both.
Include version information for the profile or platform in your
answer.
The RI will be implemented inside the open source project Pluto at
Apache.
Nick
