David H. DeWolf wrote: > At quick glance they don't look to be a problem. I think in most > situations they were inserted when a private member was set in the > constructor and not modified elsewhere. Yes, Eclipse checks for exactly these cases.
> Seems reasonable, but we should > just remember in the future that there's no reason they need to be final. True, as soon as we need to modify the variable somewhere, we just remove the final modifier. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
