edward,
I had instrumented the driver not to check the
pciidlist by drm_probe, the driver is successfully
installed on ATOM platform.
# prtconf -D | grep i915
display, instance #0 (driver name: i915)
#
# cat /etc/name_to_major | grep i915
i915 99
# uadmin 3 25 99
#
Oct 23 14:40:14 lippert genunix: [ID 535284
kern.notice] System is being suspended
Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert The system is back where you
left!
Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert genunix: [ID 583038
kern.notice] System has been resumed.
I think (0x8086, 0x8108) also could be added into the
supported device list for i915.
Thanks,
Venu.
--- "edward.shu" <Edward.Shu at Sun.COM> wrote:
> Venu C:
> > Kerry,
> >
> > is i915 is not supporting, is just because it is
> not
> > claiming the device. or the hardware interface to
> > graphic device (0x8086, 0x8108) is supported by
> i915
> > or
> > it is not compatible to i915 supported hardware.
> >
> > Since the generic vgatext, is claiming and device
> > works
> > fine. As a simple test, if I add a driver alias
> for
> > i915 "pci8086,8108" will it work?
> >
> >
> > Venu.
> > --- Kerry Shu <Kerry.Shu at Sun.COM> wrote:
> >
> i915 was supposed to support all the Intel graphics
> chips for PC.
> However, we can not test all of the hardware
> before the integration,
> so some chip IDs may not be included in the
> supported list. As to
> "pci8086,8108", is it a graphics chip embedded in
> ATOM platform?
> It may be different from Intel graphics for PC.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > driver-discuss mailing list
> > driver-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
> >
>
>
