Setting acpi_rtc-wake to 6sec, I noticed system being resumed in /var/adm/messages 12:27:29 System is being suspended 12:27:48 System has been resumed
Is this because Display backlight doesnot turn on after resume? is there any known workaround for i915 driver or Intel (0x8086, 0x8108) graphics controller. without autowake up setting, I still dont see resume event logged on reset(after waitng a while) Thanks, venu. --- Venu C <venu at ascentronics.com> wrote: > > > Now I tried to disable the iprb with the suggested > method over rem_drv approach(the mail, where I > informed the results before I receive this). > > uadmin 3 22 is working fine. > > uadmin 3 20: > > - suspend is fine > - resume part is not working > . by pressing any key didnot resume > . In my platform I have power, reset, wake > buttons > . When I press Wake and Power buttons, I dont > see > cpr resume. > . after few tries, and then power cycle system > boots normally > > Did I need to change any BIOS PowerManagement > parameters? or anything else missing. > > Thanks, > Venu. > > > > > > --- Randy Fishel <randy.fishel at sun.com> wrote: > > > > > > > So it looks like you might have a framebuffer > > solution. But IIRC, > > you are constrained by IPRB. A next test would be > > to disable this > > driver from loading by adding: > > > > -B disable-iprb=true > > > > to the grub $kernel line, and see if it will now > > suspend (try 'uadmin > > 3 22 first). I would be interested in your > results. > > > > > > ---- Randy > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Venu C wrote: > > > > > edward, > > > > > > I had instrumented the driver not to check > the > > > pciidlist by drm_probe, the driver is > successfully > > > installed on ATOM platform. > > > > > > # prtconf -D | grep i915 > > > display, instance #0 (driver name: i915) > > > # > > > > > > # cat /etc/name_to_major | grep i915 > > > i915 99 > > > # uadmin 3 25 99 > > > # > > > > > > Oct 23 14:40:14 lippert genunix: [ID 535284 > > > kern.notice] System is being suspended > > > Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert The system is back where > > you > > > left! > > > Oct 23 14:40:18 lippert genunix: [ID 583038 > > > kern.notice] System has been resumed. > > > > > > I think (0x8086, 0x8108) also could be added > into > > the > > > supported device list for i915. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Venu. > > > --- "edward.shu" <Edward.Shu at Sun.COM> wrote: > > > > > > > Venu C: > > > > > Kerry, > > > > > > > > > > is i915 is not supporting, is just because > > it is > > > > not > > > > > claiming the device. or the hardware > interface > > to > > > > > graphic device (0x8086, 0x8108) is supported > > by > > > > i915 > > > > > or > > > > > it is not compatible to i915 supported > > hardware. > > > > > > > > > > Since the generic vgatext, is claiming and > > device > > > > > works > > > > > fine. As a simple test, if I add a driver > > alias > > > > for > > > > > i915 "pci8086,8108" will it work? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venu. > > > > > --- Kerry Shu <Kerry.Shu at Sun.COM> wrote: > > > > > > > > > i915 was supposed to support all the Intel > > graphics > > > > chips for PC. > > > > However, we can not test all of the hardware > > > > before the integration, > > > > so some chip IDs may not be included in the > > > > supported list. As to > > > > "pci8086,8108", is it a graphics chip > embedded > > in > > > > ATOM platform? > > > > It may be different from Intel graphics for > PC. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > driver-discuss mailing list > > > > > driver-discuss at opensolaris.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > pm-discuss mailing list > > > pm-discuss at opensolaris.org > > > > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-discuss > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > driver-discuss mailing list > driver-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss >
