Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >The UI and interface are a separate issue from the underlying >capability, IMO. The power.conf thing is clearly crap, and should be >replaced. I agree with Randy that we should not remove the capability >if it is useful. I also would therefore object to removal of the sole >interface to configure a feature *unless* an alternative were made >available.
I think we are in the process now of moving what's in power.conf to SMF? I suggest not to change/remove any knob in the current power.conf in phase I. This will help us to do the migration smoothly and easily and also give a backward compatible UI to the user. There certainly are a few power related properties need to be improved, and there are also some new architectures thoughts could be implemented to replace the current ones, like Garrett's two-level configuration are the good ideas. But I think they are separate ARC cases and should be reviewed in later phases. Thanks, -Aubrey _______________________________________________ pm-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-discuss
