On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:23 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2007/3/6, Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I find myself wondering if /etc/pm/config shouldn't really > > be /usr/lib/pm-utils/config , actually. That would make /etc/pm > > entirely the domain of the admin (and any ISV software he adds) > > Imo putting config files in /usr/lib/ is a bad idea. No one expects > them in /usr/lib, Debian policies forbid it and I also think the FHS > does not promote this.
But that's the point -- they're not config files, they're system scripts. *All* of the behavior can be configured through the files under /etc/pm/ . Really the file named "config" is more like "default configuration". -- Peter _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
