On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:47:31 +0100 Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:51:48PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:23 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > 2007/3/6, Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > I find myself wondering if /etc/pm/config shouldn't really > > > > be /usr/lib/pm-utils/config , actually. That would make /etc/pm > > > > entirely the domain of the admin (and any ISV software he adds) > > > > > > Imo putting config files in /usr/lib/ is a bad idea. No one expects > > > them in /usr/lib, Debian policies forbid it and I also think the FHS > > > does not promote this. > > > > But that's the point -- they're not config files, they're system > > scripts. *All* of the behavior can be configured through the files > > under /etc/pm/ . Really the file named "config" is more like "default > > configuration". > > #!/bin/sh > ####################################################### > # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE, edit /etc/pm/config instead! # > ####################################################### For the debian this won't be good enough, everything under /etc is the domain of the administrator. But you can of course argue that is out problem;) grts Tim _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
