On Nov 8, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/11/8 Victor Lowther <victor.lowt...@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:09 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> 2009/10/31 Victor Lowther <victor.lowt...@gmail.com>: >>>> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >>>>> Comments welcome. >>>>> If there are no complaints, I'm going to commit this patch and >>>>> intend >>>>> to apply it to the Debian pm-utils package. >>>> >>>> Go ahead and push it -- let me know when it is in the git repo, >>>> and I >>>> will spin a new release of pm-utils. >>> >>> Hi Victor, thanks for pushing this fix. Seems I forgot to do it >>> myself. >> >> Yep -- I have not tagged it yet, but >> http://pm-utils.freedesktop.org/releases/pm-utils-1.2.6.tar.gz is >> ready >> to be tested by someone other than me. :) It includes all the >> changes >> you pushed to the tree. > > I did some basic testing with uswusp and in-kernel suspend, and it > seems to work fine so far. > > As you already uploaded 1.2.6, does that mean, the following patches > should be in a 1.2.6.1 release?
Not at all. The current tarball is not official y > >>> As you are planning a new release, could you review/pull the >>> patches attached to >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554959 (return 0 in >>> maybe_deallocvt) >> >> That looks fine. >> >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540122 (typo, s/ >>> Om/On/) >> >> The patch to the .8 file is redundant, we built it automatically from >> the xml source. The xml bit of the patch is fine. > > ok, shall I commit the two patches above? what's your preferred way of > commiting such bug fixes. > Should they go to the stable 1.2 branch and be merged to master or > shall they be committed to master and you cherry-pick what you see fit > for the stable branch? > >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542923 (ntpd init >>> scripts is called "ntp" on Debian/Ubuntu. I'm fine with keeping a >>> Debian/Ubuntu specific patch for that though) >> >> That should be Debian/Ubuntu specific > > ok > >>> Most other, relevant Debian patches at [1] have already been >>> merged. >>> The patches Ubuntu is shipping is at [2]. >> >> Yeah, I need to trawl through the bugtrackers of the major distros >> again >> for pm-utils and borrow their general fixes. >> >> Having a toddler is an awesome way to lose track of other projects >> for >> months at a time. :) > > Hey, didn't know that. My congratulations! > > Michael > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list Pm-utils@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
