2009/11/12 Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org>: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:37:50AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> remove have_smart_intel > > What's the reason for this? intel is capable of restoring state even if > it's not using modesetting - running quirks on top of the state > restoration is likely to break things.
Hm, my bad then. I have to say that I tested to boot a system with i915.modesetting=0 and afaicr there was no /sys/module/i915 directory then, so have_smart_intel wouldn't trigger anyway, what gives? Maybe my memory doesn't serve me well but I thought have_smart_intel was written in the early days of the KMS support for intel when there was no inteface like /proc/fb yet, which could be used to check for KMS. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list Pm-utils@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
