Hi all,

Paolo Lucente, 05.07.2006 01:07:
> while the idea of integrating a kind of sFlow/NetFlow probe has been
> already considered (i remember some thoughts recently exchanged with
> Sven Anderson about this), i'm somewhat not fully convinced. 

[...]

> Integrating either the probe or the replicator into any pmacct
> daemon will be certainly useful but would also result in a not
> proper approach, in my opinion. 
> 
> Comments, any thoughts ?

pmacct is already a probe, since you have the pcap interface and, more
important, you do L7 classification, which is clearly a probe-task. As we
discussed before in private mails, I would love to see some features of
pmacct also on a lightweight probe. It would be nice, if pmacct would
evolve to a modular flow processing framework, where you can also compile
a smaller version with pcap import and Netflow/IPFIX/sFlow exporters and
L7 classification API. Maybe it makes sense to tear apart the
probe/exporter and collector parts in general, because in the case you are
running both on the same machine, you anyway don't have performance in
mind, and you can just send it by local IP-traffic from the exporter to
the collector. And the collector part should also offer an abstract data
access API, so that the data processing applications don't depend on the
database and format, that the collector is using.

>From the existing probes it seems only nProbe offers some kind of L7
analysis. (VoIP stuff, i think.)

I know, lots of "wise words", but I'm also disposed to offer some time for
coding within my means.


Cheers,

Sven

-- 
Sven Anderson
Institute for Informatics - http://www.ifi.informatik.uni-goettingen.de
Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
Lotzestr. 16-18, 37083 Goettingen, Germany

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to