On 4/18/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 11:23:05 AM, Patrick wrote: > > > Policy, perhaps. I don't want to enforce a strict limit, and on the > > whole humans are much better at determining appropriate lengths. > > On the whole yes. But there are exceptions. > > > However, I also agree with Hans that Summary: is intended for > > short descriptions and not full paragraphs. > > So what is reasonable short for Summary: > > > But, the Cookbook is also a wiki, so if something on a recipe > > page doesn't seem appropriate, anyone is free to modify it to > > something more appropriate. If that leads to a dispute then > > we can always discuss/moderate it here. > > I only brought this up because of an ongoing dispute.
Sorry to have you involved with this Pm. But on the subject, I have policy suggestion of my own... Namely, that recipe writers only have one recipe page for each distinct recipe, and not a completely separate page for each possible application of it--like ZAPforum, ZAPblog, ZAPvote, etc.. Those could all be stored in a ZAP group and links to the sample uses of the recipe be made from the ZAP recipe page. I prefer a slightly fuller description (for those recipes with many features) on one page, than 8 or 10 separate pages each having their own description line. I suppose I could take that route if insisted, but in the interest of a cleaner cookbook, I'd rather not. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
