Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 12:16:03 PM, The wrote: > Namely, that recipe writers only have one recipe page for each > distinct recipe, and not a completely separate page for each possible > application of it--like ZAPforum, ZAPblog, ZAPvote, etc.. Those could > all be stored in a ZAP group and links to the sample uses of the > recipe be made from the ZAP recipe page.
I think this is not reasonable for a general form processing script. It needs to be documented in its generality, as well, if possible, working examples given how to implement a variety of uses. And as my experience tells, those examples should be as detailed as possible, if possible work "out of the box", or require only simple copy and paste to create working pages. This is too much for a single page in cookbook. Yes we could create a group for these "applications", and link to it. But storage or name conflicts are hardly the issue here. The issue is that such "applications" like FoxForum, FoxBlog etc. are appearing in pagelists as separate entries, which to me they are, as each will answer a particular question, for instance looking for a forum to be used inside PmWiki. Someone looking for a forum recipe will not necessarily look for a general form processor. So I think it is good use of cookbook pages. And someone looking for a forum will not likely scan 6 lines of "Summary" of Acme/ZAP to see if it contains the word forum. Six lines of summary is a longer description, and will not aid quick pagelist scans to find what one is searching. ~Hans _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
