On 6/18/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we introduce a separate (:nositeheader:) directive, then
> there's a question (and potential confusion) as to the sequence
> of processing -- should a group be able to suppress the site-wide
> header with (:nositeheader:), or should the site-wide header be
> able to suppress the per-group header with (:nogroupheader:)?
> (We can't do both.)
That's an unfortunate snag, but not a huge one.
My choice would be to let a group be able suppress the site-wide header.
The way to suppress a group header is to delete the GroupHeader page. :-)
Come to think of it, letting a site-wide header be able to suppress
the per-group header is bound to create confusion at least sometimes.
("Dear list, My GroupHeader page isn't having any effect...")
Hagan
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
