On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:41:12PM -0700, H. Fox wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >--- "H. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can conditional markup be put a site-wide header
> >> that achieves
> >>
> >> Look for a page named GroupHeader in the
> >> current group, if that exists we use it,
> >> otherwise use "fallback" markup.
>
> Or maybe
>
> (:if ! exists {$Group}.GroupHeader :)
> (:include Site.DefaultGroupHeader :)
>
> since {$Group}.GroupHeader is already included automatically.
> If that works, it means the "fallback" Proposal #1 comes "free" with
> Proposal #2, does it not?
This fails the (:nogroupheader:) aspect, since
Site.DefaultGroupHeader can still end up being included
even if a page has (:nogroupheader:) in it.
...unless you're suggesting that (:nogroupheader:) also
affects the (site-wide) page containing the conditional
markup above. But I'm guessing not, because you seem to have
a -1 vote for having both the sitewide and group header
controlled by the (:nogroupheader:) directive.
Pm
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
