On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Petko Yotov wrote: > On Wednesday 21 January 2009 10:08:54 Christian Ridderström wrote: > > So, something that I think would help is setting up separate public areas > > for the testing of different recipes. These areas could be a wiki groups > > or separate wikis and the purpose of being separate is to avoid > > interference between recipes. The public aspect mean that many people can > > contribute with the testing. > ... > > The drawback with the scheme above is that it'll require at least a little > > bit more involvement by e.g. Petko in terms of setting up the testing > > area.
It actually requires a *lot* more involvement by Petko. > I don't feel we should do this on PmWiki.org, even in separate groups or wiki > fields. Wiki fields are not hardcore separated or sandboxed, a broken recipe > is able to corrupt many things, everything that is in the home directory of > the running process. I agree -- the review/test requirements, especially for some recipes, are quite onerous. Whatever testing framework gets developed for PmWiki, it would be nice if that framework could be also used by recipes. But I don't know that I want that framework to be specifically tied to pmwiki.org . Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
