On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:00:09PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >>> I don't feel we should do this on PmWiki.org, even in separate groups >>> or wiki fields. Wiki fields are not hardcore separated or sandboxed, >>> a broken recipe is able to corrupt many things, everything that is in >>> the home directory of the running process. >> >> I agree -- the review/test requirements, especially for some >> recipes, are quite onerous. > > How does this apply to the recipes that might be candidates for being > shipeed with a release? If we don't trust or test them, is it really ok > to include them?
I don't think it is, and that's part of the issue. I think that any inclusion of a recipe in a release is likely to lead people to believe that they've received at least some level of review. The problem is that we don't currently have a good review mechanism, so it could end up being very misleading. Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
