On Monday 13 July 2009 20:07:04 DaveG wrote: > If that is correct, why would we not want to do this? I can see it might be > some work, but it sounds like Ed W is prepared for this, and just wants > input on what he should be looking for. (Again, this is how I read the > thread, and might be wrong.)
I read that someone knowingly broke his documentation links, and who doesn't assume this -- it is our fault, not his. We want to "*deliberately* keep things broken". Note that *nothing* was broken until *he* broke it. And we're trying to help him with sample code to fix his bugs. And we are asked what we are guys smoking, and "Right well fuck it". I do not wish participate in this thread anymore. For the record, the pmwiki.org documentation is not locked for editing. _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
