Note that *nothing* was broken until *he* broke it.
Again, the proposal seems to be we can minimize the effects of this by
making the documentation more consistent with itself.
Agreed. Actually the proposal was even simpler: improve the consistency
of the documentation - perhaps I shouldn't have even mentioned WHY I
cared and we would have avoided a lot of wasted words... (it was only
one short para in the middle of the whole email...)
For the record, the pmwiki.org documentation is not locked for editing.
I think Ed W was proposing he would change it. He was seeking guidance and
input on a single consistent way to move forwards.
Thankyou for actually reading my original email - appreciated
Ed W
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
