Yes please. I have found bzr and launchpad really confusing even that
years ago I was bzr user.
I would prefer Github because it is more popular, but for the features I do
like issue tracker of BitBucket more.
- Mikael
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Kalle Raiskila <[email protected]> wrote:
> Den Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:40:40 -0400
> skrev Re: [pocl-devel] git?:
>
> > On 2013-08-21, at 16:54 , Pekka Jääskeläinen
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > > Questions it boils down to:
> > >
> > > 0) Should we move to git? From the previous discussions, I guess
> > > the other active developers (who are affected mostly by the
> > > transition) clearly vote for yes and I do not object.
> >
> > Yes. Yes! Yes please!
>
> Seems we have three ays, and two abstains, then :)
>
> I have no preference between these two. Bzr has those nice running
> numbers, but I am more familiar with git, so it evens out.
>
> The only thing I have an objection against is pointless extra work. But
> if the switch has some benefit for some, then the work is not exactly
> pointless. And then we have a pretty good idea of who might volunteer to
> do it ;)
>
>
> > > 1) Where to move the repository? It should have good issue/bug
> > > tracking too. Is GitHub the best? The most active developers should
> > > have the choice. I do not have an opinion on this.
> >
> > GitHub is fine. Personally, I prefer BitBucket.
>
> We already are hosted on sourceforge for wiki and maillist, but the
> weight of that is pretty minor.
>
> The minimum requirements for the hosting is the possibility of private
> forks of the project for merge/pull requests (github, bb and lp all
> have adequate functionality here), and a working bug tracker (which I
> guess all the sites have).
>
> Then there is the social aspect. Quite often when trying out new stuff
> one finds something small to fix. The barrier to send in that fix is
> considerably lower, when you already have an account on that site. So
> which site is largest?
>
> And finally. Commit hooks. For the buildbot. I might actually change my
> vote to a weak 'yes' for the transition for this feature (that
> I never found in launchpad) alone :)
>
> Eric, what makes BitBucket your preference?
>
> >
> > Doesn't LaunchPad support git as well? However, I find its user
> > interface confusing, and much prefer BitBucket (or GitHub).
> >
> > > 2) How is the transition done? bzr-git can be used to preserve
> > > version history? What about the bugs? Just move open ones manually
> > > and leave the closed ones be?
> >
> > Yes, version history should be preserved. Copying open bugs over
> > should be fine -- I hope there are not too many?
>
> 14, presently.
> Of which 4 might be closable if we switch to the LLVM-API version.
> Only, the API version surely has more bugs than that right now, but
> those would be reported at the new site :)
>
> kalle
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> pocl-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
pocl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
