saptah wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm really interested in this too :)
>   
I suspect there are folks just quietly using the libraries.  Sure, we 
would like to see more activity too, especially on the mail list instead 
of IRC (mail lists seem better at building the community).  But to 
answer your question, is something wrong ?  bugs?  some feature needed 
?  if not, there is probably no push for the developers to just have 
another release.  We're using the Werkzeug, SQLAlchemy, Jinja stack as 
in the tutorial and it's working very nicely.  But been having trouble 
with deployment (which I'm working on in the next hour or so), but I 
think that is more a write up / docs issue and I will post any 
suggestions I come up with.  We're also going to require some sort of 
session middleware add-in which isn't addressed very well but probably 
will look into Beaker.  Again, not sure if any improvements are needed 
or most likely just a docs issue. 


>
>
> On 27 oct, 22:26, bsdemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I'd like to know what is the Werkzeug development status for a now? It
>> seems there are no commits except to docs about 4 months? Are new
>> releases planned? Thanks!
>>
>> P.S. Sorry for my english
>>     
> >
>
>   


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pocoo-libs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to