Hi, For me, is just curiosity. Maybe it whould be great if we had more documentation and examples, but i think werkzeug is great and complete.
:) On 28 oct, 15:51, MilesTogoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > saptah wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm really interested in this too :) > > I suspect there are folks just quietly using the libraries. Sure, we > would like to see more activity too, especially on the mail list instead > of IRC (mail lists seem better at building the community). But to > answer your question, is something wrong ? bugs? some feature needed > ? if not, there is probably no push for the developers to just have > another release. We're using the Werkzeug, SQLAlchemy, Jinja stack as > in the tutorial and it's working very nicely. But been having trouble > with deployment (which I'm working on in the next hour or so), but I > think that is more a write up / docs issue and I will post any > suggestions I come up with. We're also going to require some sort of > session middleware add-in which isn't addressed very well but probably > will look into Beaker. Again, not sure if any improvements are needed > or most likely just a docs issue. > > > > > On 27 oct, 22:26, bsdemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'd like to know what is the Werkzeug development status for a now? It > >> seems there are no commits except to docs about 4 months? Are new > >> releases planned? Thanks! > > >> P.S. Sorry for my english > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pocoo-libs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
