Re: L versus L ?

[Joe Smith]

Ronald J Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is still easy.  For example:
> 
> <A NAME="sec1">
> Section 1

Illegal HTML syntax, mandatory "</A>" missing.

> <A NAME="sec1-foos">
> <A NAME="-foos">
> Section 1, Item foos

Illegal HTML syntax, second "<A>" started before first "<A>" closed.

You cannot have two different named anchors for the same text.
It would have to be

  <A NAME="sec1-foos">Section 1,</A> <A NAME="-foos">Item foos</A>

and that is awkward.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    See http://www.inwap.com/ for details