On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:31:03PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> think there's a great backward compatibility issue. (I can see an
> implementation efficiency issue, though: with the L<foo/bar> versus
> L<foo/"bar"> distinction one can immediately intuit whether the
> reference is document-local or not, and one does not need to process
> the whole document first to know which references are local and which
> are external.) But then again, people should be primarily using
> L</bar> or L<"bar"> anyway to refer locally, right?
Whatever you decide on, I will make an effort to patch into at least
some of the core pod, until my brain drips out of my ears, anyway.
Michael
