At 01:38 PM 2001-08-20 -0700, Tim Gim Yee wrote:
>> Hm. What could look like a URL in a L<thing> construct, but not /really/
>> be something you'd want interpreted as a hyperlink to that URL? I'd
>> appreciate a good plausable example.
>
>Hm... removing L<sec> also removes all my good plausible examples.
Removing L<sec>? Did I do that?
[looking] Hm, I don't see L<sec> in the old (current, pre-rewrite) perlpod.
Was L<sec> an old syntax that was previously removed?
--
Sean M. Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/
