> Okay, that makes sense. Nice and straightforward.
> So then the new logic for the "What's the title method" would just need to
> tolerate "=head1 blah blah blah whatever (NAME)" as a variant of "=head1
> NAME", i.e., both meaning "the next paragraph will be the short title of
> this document".
> Then I could make a "What are ALL the titles" method that wouldn't just
> stop at the first NAME/blah(NAME) thing, but would read the whole document
> looking for all such things.
>
> And, in fact, I could make these just specific ('NAME'-specific) cases of
> what's-the-first-FOO / what're-all-the-FOOs methods, for arbitratry values
> of FOO (like 'NAME', 'DESCRIPTION', 'AUTHOR', etc.). Sound good?
Yup.
--
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
