* Sean 'TorgoX' Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06 Sep 2003 05:35]: [...] > Anyone have any preferences either way? I think I might be leaning > toward the former approach (where =headN closes =over) just because I > think most cases of people apparently having a =head1 inside an =over > are actually mistakes and that they really meant to close the =over.
There's a case in DateTime::TimeZone where there is a =head3 inside an =over that is meant to be 'over'. That said, I spent some time a couple of days ago inserting missing "=back"s into about 10 of the DateTime modules (so they're render nicely in my personal Pod::Simple based viewer and also in search.cpan.org). And I've asked the author in question for the above =head3 thing to think about arranging it differently. cheers, -- Iain.
