"Sean M. Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Now, I'm thinking of saying that =headN's can't be inside =over's, so that > if such is found, it will DWIMically close the open =over. > But going the other way, I'm thinking "no way, there's nothing wrong with > having a =headN inside an =over! Don't OPPRESS ME with your rules, you > FASCIST! ATTICA!!! ATTICA!!!!".
pod being designed in the DWIM tradition, clearly the =over should be closed. But the pickier checkers should point out the error of the author's ways. Mike Guy
