On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> 
> Comments?

I agree with the bug report, FWIW (just based on reading the
report,  I haven't verified that nested formatting has been
broken).

Cheers,
-Jan


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Christopher J. Madsen via RT" <[email protected]>
> > Date: March 15, 2010 10:09:12 AM PDT
> > To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > Subject: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake (nested formatting 
> > codes)
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> >
> > Mon Mar 15 13:09:05 2010: Request 55602 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by CJM
> >       Queue: Pod-Simple
> >     Subject: Bug #12239 was a mistake (nested formatting codes)
> >   Broken in: 3.09
> >    Severity: Important
> >       Owner: Nobody
> >  Requestors: [email protected]
> >      Status: new
> > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55602 >
> >
> >
> > In bug #12239, Schwern expected "C<<< C<<foo>> >>>" to render as a
> > literal "C<<foo>>", and you changed Pod-Simple to make that happen.  But
> > I disagree with this interpretation of the spec, and consider it a
> > serious loss of functionality.
> >
> > Where exactly in perlpod or perlpodspec does it suggest that characters
> > inside C<> are treated differently than those inside C<< >>?  As I read
> > the spec, the only difference is in how the end of the code is located.
> > Once you've located the end of the content (and stripped the mandatory
> > whitespace from the C<< >> version), it's rendered the same.
> >
> > That is, I claim that "C<<< C<<foo>> >>>" is a C<> nested inside a C<>,
> > and Schwern should have written ""C<<< CZ<><<foo>> >>>" or "C<<<
> > CE<lt><foo>> >>>".
> >
> > perlpod clearly states that "C<$a E<lt>=E<gt> $b>" is rendered as "$a
> > <=> $b".  You're saying that
> >
> >    C<$a E<lt>=E<gt> $b>
> >  C<< $a E<lt>=E<gt> $b >>
> >
> > mean two completely different things, and I don't see where the spec
> > supports that.
> >
> > Otherwise, how am I supposed to write:
> >
> > S<< C<< name => value >> >>
> >
> > or
> >
> > S<< C<< <bug-PostScript-Calendar AT rt.cpan.org> >> >>
> >

Reply via email to