David E. Wheeler wrote:
My interpretation of that was that any angle brackets inside should be considered literal, and thus escaped. The whole point of `<< >>` AFAICS was to allow one to use literal brackets without escaping them, as one must do in `<>`.
That's my interpretation too. If you have to escape every angle bracket inside doubled-up C<<>> tags, there's really no point in even having the doubled-up tags.
I think the latest bug report is wrong. Allison
