> > My guess is that it's just plain wrong, so no wonder it's confusing. > Perhaps it's reflecting an early design, or perhaps it's just a typo, and L > was meant instead of C. L<> can link to =items provided they are of a type > that permits that. Currently, the only ones that are are ones that are in > what html calls definition lists, at least in Pod::Html. >
I do not think it would be a typo for it is repeated in several cases (unless it was a typo in a find/replace all, I suppose). Whatever the reason, could you rephrase your last sentence? I feel that it will shed some light on something I am not grasping, but currently it is rather difficult to understand.
