On 11-05-21 10:54 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
I don't know what the backwards compatibility issues are; I'm just saying that the current scheme makes the wrong distinctions for my purposes, and I can't imagine where the information is actually useful.
That seems to be the problem with =over/=item/=back. The original specification was not clear enough and different programmers interpreted it differently. Perhaps it is time to resolve the variations.
Can anyone say POD 2.0? -- Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth, Shawn Confusion is the first step of understanding. Programming is as much about organization and communication as it is about coding. The secret to great software: Fail early & often. Eliminate software piracy: use only FLOSS.
