On 26/07/2007 21:43, Craig Ringer wrote: > I'm really curious ... why Visual Studio 6? It's _ancient_ and quite > broken in its support for standard C++ . Lots of people seem to use it > and I'm always puzzled by it. > > Personally I use MinGW, gcc on UNIX, and the Visual Studio Express > Edition . The Express Edition edition seems fine and has all the > critical bits - full platform SDK and compiler, full debugger, etc. No > profiler, but that's the only real lack I've hit so far. > > Then again, I've never been a big fan of IDEs and I work across many > platforms, so I don't get too hung up on IDE-specific plugins and features. > > -- > Craig Ringer > We use Visual Studio 6 just for an historic reason. Some of our applications have been developed using this version by the past and are still under maintenance today. Most of our new applications are now developed in Java. That's why we didn't invest time or money in the last Visual Studio version.
Have you got any news regarding the linearized PDF feature ? Teddy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
