On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 15:06, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > On 18 January 2019 at 09:29 Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 01:14, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > I'm a bit in a stale situation now. Can I fix the change in > > a bigger merged patch 1-5? > > I advise against that, because for accepting the two first > patches I'd need them separate, and I don't think you need > to provide a fixed version of the second patch as the fix > is already in the post I'm replying to and it's a simple one > so I can easily insert it into the code before testing. >
Ok, no problem. Thank your for reviewing. > I'm not sure I can accept the further patches because of the > (look-like at least for me) ABI changes, before the release > coming next, I think it'd be 0.9.7 and consist of fixes for > security vulnerabilities, crashes and exceptions avoidable > without changing the ABI or API (maybe supporting more uses). > > Yes, they definitely introduce ABI changes, as better stated in the cover letter of the series. Actually this is mainly linux distributions maintainers concern: I don't see any distribution to ship newer 0.x release within the same distribution major version, but who knows? _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
