On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:39 AM Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 06:19, zyx <z...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > I still suggest to move to a single number SO versioning > > > > Okay, you convinced me. You've a "green" from my side for this change. > > > > Good. Also doors will always be opened to move back to a "full" X.Y > versioning later, if for example we find tools that update the version > automatically (and we bend CMake to use only the major component X in > SONAME), so I think there's no need to worry too much about this > change now. > > As Y and other parts are really irrelevant I think it is better to have just libpodofo.so.X than to have both symlink libpodofo.so.X and actual libpodofo.so.X.Y. Cheers, > Francesco > > > _______________________________________________ > Podofo-users mailing list > Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users >
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
