On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:42:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:18:55AM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote: > > > > > after all, if you find some time, please have a look at UML. it was > > > started by Rationale and is now "developed" by the OMG (the ones that make > > > CORBA spec if i got that right...). even if you don't like CORBA :) > > > > > > http://www.omg.org/uml/ tutorials, introductions etc. can be found in > > > your favourite search engine or library
[much removed] If you recall, the component description language I am working on has two major design goals: 1. It is directly readable and parseable by Perl. POE will be able to load it as components are used and register various aspects of them that are not normally available. 2. It is directly readable and parseable-- as text-- by humans. These descriptions will exist in POD, and they will actually be part of the documentation for a module. This will always ensure a minimum standard of documentation is included with every working component. The more I consider UML, the less it seems to pertain to these goals. -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sf.net
