On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:45:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:47:30AM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote: > > > > 2. It is directly readable and parseable-- as text-- by humans. These > > descriptions will exist in POD, and they will actually be part of > > the documentation for a module. This will always ensure a minimum > > standard of documentation is included with every working component. > > A textual presentation is easy to do and is similar to a class declaration. > The advantage of the graph presentation can be created by an external viewer. > I have used an OCL tool that did this and it was ok. It basically used > the meanings of the graph's entities as keywords. > > I think that we should do it the same way. But we should try to specify > the subset that we are going to use first. The prototype notation could > be helpful, things like that.
I have already registered Garrett Goebel's and will gladly consider others. Please put together a prototype of your ideal notation using the echo server as a basis for your examples. This way we can compare the same program under different notations. -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sf.net
