On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:09:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:22:58PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote: > > > > The problem that I have with using POE::Component is that it is > > occupied. I'd hate to see backward compatibility broken by a new > > POE release. It would also be useful if the name were still nmemonic. > > Other than that I dont think it matters much. > > I'd vote for POE::Object. Because it is an instance. POE::Class would be the > class in general.
Maybe we should create POE::Class classes that instantiate to POE::Object objects. :) -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sf.net
