On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:39:08PM -0500, Garrett Goebel wrote: > > I gather that Rocco Caputo would prefer a textual notation > that looks like Perl. Whereas torvald is recommending XMI.
It needn't look like Perl, but it should be friendly enough to include in documentation. > However, HUTN seems oriented toward describing objects... > I suppose XMI is too for that matter. I haven't yet read > enough to figure out how someone would model states in HUTN. > Still, it's food for thought... and might help prevent the > tendency to reinvent wheels. [yawning] I finished the HUTN specs. The HUTN implements a lot of interesting ideas. I could see it representing instances and associations in a complete program. It doesn't seem friendly enough for documentation, though. Maybe I need to spend some more time with it. I'm still making time to read the papers you mentioned. -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sf.net
