On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:04:10PM -0500, Sean Egan wrote: > > I read the page and I like the idea of a plan for standardized > test. Howver, I am a little concerned with some parts of the plan. > > The "unit tests" sound good but POE is a whole environment. So > having unit tests are a good thing for those parts that can > be isolated, but overall will have limited impact on the over > all test framework. > > The "meta tests" are just "generic loop tests". I think you > should recharacterized the "meta tests" into two parts. The > first, loop implementation specific tests and the generic > loop tests. I know that is already sorta in there but the structure, > ie calling them "z00000" for both the implementation specific > loop tests and the generic loop tests, doesn't make the distinction > clear. > > Further, other pluggable parts of POE need generic tests. Like > POE::Queue and what not. > > My thoughts are along these lines: > > - unit tests for those parts which are independent of the > POE environment. > > - Specific tests for Loop and Queue implementations. > > - generic tests for Loop and Queue (run over each implementation) > > - Tests for each of the other standard components. > > I would like to help more, but I rarely log into IRC, and most > of this kind of discussion seems to go on there.
Thanks for the reply. http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/Test_Reforms has been harshly (and incompletely, but it's like 03:00 here) revised based on your feedback. I hope it captures the essence of your suggestions, and I look forward to further refinements (especially in the incomplete sections) (by anyone, not just Sean). I think you're mistaken about IRC. A lot of discussion winds up rotting in obscurity on POE's wiki. It contains a globally visible (and editable) repository of design notes that nobody else uses. I even maintain a to-do list covering the goals for the next few POE releases on it, although they tend to slip pretty badly. So in practice the wiki's a flop. I'm willing to post design documents somewhere more effective. Matt Cashner has suggested they go to this mailing list. They can be upwards of a few hundred lines, but I'm willing to try it. Suggestions. If you got 'em, flaunt 'em. -- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
